Archive for the NEWS & POLITICS Category

Illegal for Dakota Indians to enter Minnesota or Dakota?!?

May 29th, 2009 Posted in DAKOTA HISTORY, NEWS & POLITICS | no comment »

 

After the Dakota Conflict in 1862, Congress passed legislation banning Dakota Indians from Minnesota and the Dakotas.Now, over 140 years later, one state lawmaker is asking Congress to repeal the law.

As News 12’s Bryan Piatt reports… it’s stirring up mixed emotions among area tribe members. Sheldon Wolfchild read the news imagewhen he opened the newspaper a few days ago.Sheldon Wolfchild says, "I’m going…all kinds of emotions run through me. I didn’t know it was still in the books."It still is… a ban on all Dakota Indians after war declared on these lands. That may soon be repealed after legislation brought forward by State Representative Dean Urdahl.Dean Urdahl says, "It basically is a bad law that’s still on the books. I felt there was some need for reconciliation and a need to take a bad law off the books." Wolfchild and Pam Halverson are both members of the Dakota tribe. They say the repeal would provide healing for them and also teach an important lesson to everyone in the state. Sheldon Wolfchild says, "It’s going to open up another avenue of healing for us. Not only for the Dakota people but for the other people in Minnesota to realize that we have to look at each other as common human beings from the heart…not just from the mind." But both point out it doesn’t erase what happened here over 100 years ago, when their ancestors were taken to prison camps… some even hung. Pam Halverson says, "It’s the start of a healing process for my people. It’s not going to take anything away from what happened in 1862 but it’s a start." A start Wolfchild says he’s shocked he may get to witness. Stephen Wolfchild says, "I never thought this would happen in my lifetime but I’m grateful for it." All that is needed now… is vote from Congress and a signature from President Obama.

Get this and other news. politics and satire from http://www.NewsForNatives.com

Please Share YOUR opinion!

Court rules Mdewakanton group has no claim to casinos

Mar 13th, 2009 Posted in NEWS & POLITICS | no comment »

Decision invalidates earlier ruling based on 19th-century trust, and Congress’ land deal.

from www.NewsForNatives.com

Last update: March 12, 2009 – 11:20 PM

 

WASHINGTON – A federal appeals court has ruled against a large group of Mdewakanton Dakota Indians claiming a share of the lands and gambling revenues from casinos in Prior Lake and Prairie Island.

The group, led by former Lower Sioux Community Chairman Sheldon Wolfchild, has been suing the U.S. government since 2003, claiming rights to casino riches as descendants of Mdewakanton Indians who helped white settlers during the 1862 Dakota rebellion in Minnesota.

The descendants, numbering more than 20,000 Indians in the United States and Canada, had been bolstered in recent years by decisions in the Federal Court of Claims finding that some of the lands forming part of the present-day Mystic Lake and Treasure Island casinos were intended for their use.

Federal_Appeals_Court_Mdewakanton_tribal_lawsuite_casino_land_002Federal_Appeals_Court_Mdewakanton_tribal_lawsuite_casino_land_003Federal_Appeals_Court_Mdewakanton_tribal_lawsuite_casino_land_001

But the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday invalidated earlier rulings that found the government had breached a legal 19th-century trust to the "loyal Mdewakanton." The court also found that Congress did nothing wrong in 1980 when it handed control of the lands to the present-day Shakopee Mdewakanton Dakota Community, which owns the Mystic Lake and Little Six casinos, and the Prairie Island Indian Community, which owns Treasure Island.

Membership in the two communities is limited to several hundred tribal members who enjoy millions in annual gambling profits. Many of the plaintiffs live on economically depressed reservations in Nebraska, South Dakota, and Morton, Minn.

Erick Kaardal, a Minneapolis attorney who represents Wolfchild and some 7,500 other Mdewakanton Sioux, said Thursday that he plans to appeal, probably to the U.S. Supreme Court. But Brian O’Neill, an attorney for the Shakopee tribe, said an appeal would be pointless. "This should be the end of it," he said. "It ought to be closure for an awful lot of folks who put their faith on this less-than-substantial lawsuit."

Read more or share your opinion at: www.NewsforNatives.com

 

COMMENTS:

 

commentsBS! My gt grandfather had Indian Land Certificate for Scott county which is now where Mystic Lake casino sits now, Mystic Lake is built on greediness of people who think they are lineal descendants of who the land should belong too…they all need to be shot

posted by Ida69 on Mar. 13, 09 at 11:36 AM


 commentsBut Brian O’Neill, an attorney for the Shakopee tribe, said an appeal would be pointless. "This should be the end of it," he said. "It ought to be closure for an awful lot of folks who put their faith on this less-than-substantial lawsuit." How would this be pointless???? It wasn’t pointless when he appealed the original decision…At this point I’d say the decisions are a wash….Take it to the Supreme court Mr Kaardal, I do hope that you win this for those people who have been stabbed in the back by the gov time and time again! Thanks for your hard work and many years of dedication. It is really sad to see this tribe being so charitable to different tribes and to places such as The University of Minnesota and then turn around and deny those that are actual lineal descendants….I agree…greed thru and thru….

posted by dillypot on Mar. 13, 09 at 2:04 PM

 

 

Go figure
The sad part is the govt once again comes out smelling like a rose. I have family,Aunts,Uncles and cousins, at two of the three commentscommunities involved They,the members, deserve some of the credit also for keeping people out. My Dad left there in the late 60’s to FIND A JOB. Once the communities realized what they could do,with the federal governments blessing, they started to turn people away altogether or make it very difficult to become a member. Even for the people that meet their strict guide lines to become a member.I never did meet my dad, he passed away before we had the opportuniy. I have to say though, growing up on the outside so to speak,I almost feel sorry for some of those members. Money does not solve everything and trust me, the ones that are in control of it at theses communities have plenty of their own problems to deal with.Sad deal for sure.

posted by terrylb on Mar. 13, 09 at 4:50 PM

 

Bogus 1980 Act
comments"The court also found that Congress did nothing wrong in 1980 when it handed control of the lands to the present-day Shakopee Mdewakanton Dakota Community…" The 1980 Act needs a Congressional investigation. It stinks to high hevean, and one has to wonder how many palms were greased for Congress to hand the 1886 lands over to a so called tribe created just eleven years earlier in 1969. A "tribe" made up of thirteen family members. Something stinks in Washington and the stench is coming from the BIA and it lingers over Prior Lake.

posted by renosioux on Mar. 13, 09 at 7:55

Please do share your comments HERE!

Court rejects lawsuit by Mdewakanton descendants

Mar 13th, 2009 Posted in NEWS & POLITICS | no comment »


www.NewsForNatives.com

By Lori Carlson, Editor
A court battle for tribal land rights, called “the most momentous issue in modern Indian history” by one of its champions, was halted by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Tuesday.

The court determined that self-described “lineal descendants” of the “Loyal Mdewakanton” Dakota are not owed money for land promised to their ancestors in the late 1800s. The lawsuit, Wolfchild vs. U.S., originally was filed in 2003 by the Minnesota Mdewakanton Dakota Oyate (MMDO), included land on the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux reservation. The suit is named for Lower Sioux tribal chairman Sheldon Peters Wolfchild, the main plaintiff in the lawsuit.

The MMDO – which grew from 200 to nearly 20,000 members over time – said it could prove its members are descendants of the Loyal Mdewakanton listed on the 1886 census. The group claimed the government breached its trust when it created an act in 1980 affirming that the land belongs to the Shakopee, Prairie Island and Lower Sioux communities.

Barbara Feezor Buttes, a Prior Lake resident, was among the main plaintiffs in the case. Buttes, who in 2006 called the case “momentous,” has maintained that she and the other descendants are fighting for the rights and identities of their families. Buttes even wrote a book about the issue, called “Beyond Sovereignty: The Mdewakanton Identity Heist.”

A federal judge ruled in 2007 that the so-called descendants could sue the U.S. government for mismanagement of tribal lands occupied by the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux, Prairie Island and Lower Sioux tribes in Minnesota. But on Tuesday, the appeals court reversed the judge’s ruling. According to the court decision, the Interior Department does not have owe trust land or money to the descendants even though appropriation acts created in 1888, 1889 and 1890 stated that the federal government was supposed to hold land for the “permanent benefit” of the Minnesota Mdewakanton listed on the census.

Tuesday’s court ruling states that even if those early appropriation acts could be interpreted as creating a trust for descendants, the 1980 act approved by Congress confirms that the land belongs to the reservations operated by the Shakopee, Prairie Island and Lower Sioux.

The issue stems from an 1862 Sioux uprising, after which Congress terminated the trust status of the Sioux reservation. At the same time, Congress allowed the Loyal Mdewakanton to remain in Minnesota and later created the appropriations acts of 1888-1890 to permit the secretary of the interior to buy land, cattle, horses and agriculture for the Loyal Mdewakanton. Over the years, the Mdewakanton and others formed the three federally recognized tribes involved in the case.

In addition to his 2007 ruling allowing the descendants to sue, U.S. Court of Federal Claims Judge Charles F. Lettow also granted requests by the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux and Prairie Island communities to stay out of the lawsuit. He granted the two communities’ request to quash a summons that would have required them to be defendants in the lawsuit.

On Tuesday, the plaintiffs’ attorney, Erick Kaardal of Minneapolis, issued a brief statement on the court’s opinion, saying he and other attorneys for the group are reviewing their options for appeal.

Lori Carlson can be reached at (952) 345-6378 or editor@plamerican.com.

Let’s hear YOUR opinion HERE:

Mdewakanton court case history: A fight over tribal identity

Mar 13th, 2009 Posted in NEWS & POLITICS | no comment »


By Lori Carlson, Editor
A federal judge’s April deadline has galvanized a group claiming it represents “lineal descendents” of the original occupants of tribal land in Prior Lake.

The group, Minnesota Mdewakanton Dakota Oyate (MMDO), has fought the U.S. government through the court system, claiming rights to land, money and tribal identity it says it is owed.

The group says the U.S. government helped other Mdewakanton tribes, including the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community (SMSC), grab land owned by the original land occupants, “the Loyal Mdewakanton.”
The group’s members say they can prove they are descendents of the Mdewakanton Sioux members listed in an 1886 census.

The beginnings of the conflict stem from the Sioux Uprising of 1862, but a judge’s affirmation this December of an earlier decision is a major advancement in the case, according to representatives of the MMDO.

U.S. Court of Claims Judge Charles F. Lettow originally ruled in October 2004 that the U.S. government breached a trust by allowing organizers of other tribes to take over Minnesota Mdewakanton Sioux land, including tribal land in Prior Lake now owned by the SMSC. Lettow said the government breached a trust created by appropriation acts in 1888, 1889 and 1890, which he believes stated that the federal government was supposed to hold land for the permanent benefit of the Minnesota Mdewakanton listed on the census.

In December, Lettow upheld his earlier decision, saying the United States is the holder of a trust for the Loyal Mdewakanton. He also called for all potential descendents of the people listed on the 1886 Mdewakanton census to submit proof of descent by April 28 and join the class-action suit.

The SMSC, along with the Prairie Island Mdewakanton in Red Wing, has filed an amicus brief in court saying it supports the government in the case. The Lower Sioux Mdewakanton in southern Minnesota recently announced its support for the lawsuit. The main plaintiff in the lawsuit is Sheldon Peters Wolfchild, tribal chairman of the Lower Sioux.
The U.S. government is considering whether to appeal Lettow’s ruling.
Roots

In 1862, after money promised by the federal government through a land-for-gold treaty never reached the Sioux (Dakota) living near the Minnesota River, the people rose up, raiding white settlements. After six weeks, hundreds – both white settlers and Sioux – had died.
That same year, 38 Sioux were hanged in Mankato for their participation in the uprising.

After the uprising, captured Sioux were moved to South Dakota and Nebraska, while a small group of those who did not participate in the uprising (the “Loyal Mdewakanton”) hid along the river banks. The group fought to remain in Minnesota, with its leader, Bishop Henry Whipple, appealing to Congress to provide land for the Loyal Mdewakanton. Congress obliged, though the group members had bounties on their scalps and were not allowed to use land they leased or purchased from white settlers.

The government began asking Mdewakanton who had fled after the uprising to return to Minnesota for the 1886 census. The appropriation acts of 1888, 1889 and 1890 set aside trust land here, in Red Wing and in southern Minnesota for the 208 Mdewakanton who were counted for the census.

‘Simple breach of trust’

Barbara Feezor Buttes lives in Prior Lake in her mother’s house on Eagle Creek Circle, on land where the last five generations of her family have lived.

An anthropology professor who is leading the effort to identify descendents, Buttes said the case is “a very simple situation of breach of trust” in which the government helped the SMSC – along with the Prairie Island Mdewakanton and the Lower Sioux Mdewakanton – take over land that the MMDO says belongs to the Loyal Mdewakanton.
The group contends that government incompetence – and even illegality – turned the land over to the current tribal governments, including the SMSC. The Indian Reorganization Act in 1969 established the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community, which formerly was called the Prior Lake Reservation.

“The federal government was supposed to hold forever the land in Minnesota for the permanent benefit of the Mdewakanton people,” Buttes said. “And in 1969 [the year Norman Crooks’ SMSC was established in Prior Lake], they handed over this land to this little group of people in Prior Lake. Then they told us we have to go ask them if we can be a member of their community.”

Buttes said she’s fighting for the rights, and the identity, of her family. Her mother, Winifred Feezor, and grandmother, Louise Bluestone, tried to take their own cases against the U.S. government to federal court in the 1980s. The John Bluestone family is the only Mdewakanton family in Prior Lake that has continuously occupied an original 1886 land assignment, she said, adding that her great grandfather, John Bluestone, lived on the land before it became part of the U.S. title in 1886.

Buttes said Louise Bluestone’s parents, Ellen and Harry Bluestone, both were listed on the 1886 census.

The current lawsuit “recognizes the sacrifices they made to remain in Minnesota,” she said.

The three tribes, including the SMSC, are not parties in the lawsuit.
“The judge can’t order us to do anything at this point. That’s a very important point, because there are a lot of rumors out there about imminent takeovers,” said Willie Hardacker, the SMSC’s legal counsel.

“For tribal government, it’s operations as usual. We’re not concerned about any imminent takeover,” Hardacker added.

Though the SMSC, Prairie Island and the Lower Sioux are not party to the lawsuit, the judge said he believes he has the jurisdiction to bring the tribes into the suit. Hardacker said if the case gets to the point in which the judge orders the tribes into the case, “We would make arguments.”

But Hardacker cautioned that the lawsuit could “drag on” for years.
“We are very much in the preliminary stages of the lawsuit,” he said. “Any impact on the tribe here is very much down the road.”

Buttes and the MMDO view the situation differently. Erick Kaardal, attorney for the plaintiffs, said after the judge’s December ruling, “the court’s Dec. 16 opinion is a huge step forward for us.”

Buttes’ Wicanpi Research group has organized thousands of documents that she says prove the descent of the roughly 2,500 people named as plaintiffs in the lawsuit. She said by the judge’s April 28 deadline, hundreds more plaintiffs could be added.

Buttes has written a book – available only online – called “Beyond Sovereignty: The Mdewakanton Identity Heist.” She maintains that the federal government assisted Norman Crooks (father of current Tribal Chairman Stanley Crooks) and the SMSC in taking over land she says belonged to the Minnesota Mdewakanton people.

The SMSC’s stance has been that the lawsuit plaintiffs have not proven they are descendents of those Mdewakanton on the 1886 census. Buttes said she believes in some cases, SMSC members cannot prove that they are descendents of the 1886 Mdewakanton, either.

Hardacker maintains that such proof from the “lineal descendents” has yet to be seen.

Still, Buttes said everyone on the lawsuit has proven his or her descent through submittal of birth certificates or baptismal records. She describes the judge’s recent decision as “a thrilling moment for the Mdewakanton people.”

“This is the most momentous issue in modern Indian history. It’s absolutely remarkable,” she said.

Lori Carlson can be reached at editor@plamerican.com.

Who else is wearing homeland security.

Jan 21st, 2009 Posted in NEWS & POLITICS | no comment »

Who’s Wearing The HOMELAND SECURITY FIGHTING TERRORISM SINCE 1492 T Shirts?

homeland security and Johhny Depp Johnny Depp, with his bodyguard at his side, paid a one-hour visit to the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department on Tuesday, May 16th. Johnny is wearing sunglasses, a trucker hat, his favorite camo shirt, and a black “Homeland Security” tee shirt that honors Native Americans.

homeland security and Bill Cosby Very cool!! Actually, I came across your shirt because Bill Cosby was here performing and was wearing it. I loved it and looked you up online. I’ll be wearing it often. And yes, it is the real thing. Though I am not Native, I have much respect for Native people. And it would be my pleasure to wear that t-shirt. I can’t wait to get it. –Kate Ross Marketing Manager Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino

who else is wearing homeland security: find out

Traditional Arts. For more information visit the National Museum of the American Indian’s.

Jan 18th, 2009 Posted in NEWS & POLITICS, STORIES, FOLKLORE & HISTORY | no comment »

Media only: Leonda Levchuk (202) 633-6613 Eileen Maxwell (202) 633-6615

Media Web site: http://newsdesk.si.edu

National Museum of the American Indian Hosts

Multicultural Festival as Part of Inaugural Events

The Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian will host “Out of Many: A Multicultural Festival of Music, Dance and Story” from Saturday, Jan. 17, 2009, through Monday, Jan. 19, 2009. The three-day program to commemorate the inauguration of Barack Obama will feature daily performances of live music, dancing and storytelling in the museum from a variety of cultural traditions. All performances are free and open to the public.

Forty groups will appear, including:

Alma Boliviana, who perform traditional dances of the Andes

Cambodian Buddhist Society, who perform traditional music and dance from Cambodia

Washington Chinese Youth Club, who will perform traditional Lion dances

KanKouran, West African Dancers from Senegal

Gayle Ross, Cherokee storyteller

Mariachi Los Amigos, a mariachi ensemble

Halau O ‘Aulani, who will perform Native Hawaiian music and dance

Narrowbacks, who will perform traditional Irish music accompanied by championship Irish step dancers

New Klezmer Quintet, which features Jewish traditional/jazz/fusion music

The Plateros, a Navajo blues and rock band

The Wild Zappers, a hearing-impaired dance troupe

Yaaw Tei Yi Dancers, a Tlingit group from Juneau , Alaska

The festival is presented in partnership with the National Museum of African American History and Culture, Smithsonian Latino Center, Smithsonian Asian Pacific American Program and the Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage, with assistance from the National Council for the

Smithsonian

National Museum of the American Indian

News

Dec. 17, 2008


SI-541-2008 SI-541-2008 2

Traditional Arts. For more information visit the National Museum of the American Indian’s Web site, www.AmericanIndian.si.edu.

In addition to the inauguration festival, the National Museum of the American Indian will open a small photo exhibition, “A Century Ago…They Came as Sovereign Leaders” Jan. 14, 2009. In honor of the 2009 inauguration, the exhibition focuses on President Theodore Roosevelt’s 1905 inaugural parade and the six great chiefs who participated in the procession. The chiefs included Buckskin Charlie (Ute), American Horse (Oglala Sioux), Quanah Parker (Comanche), Geronimo (Chiricahua Apache), Hollow Horn Bear (Brule Sioux) and Little Plume (Piegan Blackfeet). The exhibition goes beyond the intent of President Roosevelt’s inaugural committee, which was to add color to the show. The six Native leaders had questions and actively sought President Roosevelt’s attention to their concerns, arriving with their own purposes in mind and representing the needs of their people. The exhibition remains open until Feb. 17, 2009.

Crying Indain Commerical. This is an old commerical, where are we now?

Jan 18th, 2009 Posted in NEWS & POLITICS, PEOPLE | no comment »
CRYING INDIAN :*(

0:54
10,965 views

It’s bad enough that Bush officials went behind the backs of the >>American people with this disastrous scheme

Dec 15th, 2008 Posted in NEWS & POLITICS | no comment »

>>Please FORWARD my message to everyone you know and help block
>>this outrageous giveaway of our natural heritage. Thank you for
>>doing your part to save this natural treasure. — Robert Redford
>>
>>
>>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>>Dear Friend,
>>
>>No one voted on Election Day to hand over Utah’s Redrock
>>wilderness to oil companies.
>>
>>But the Bush Administration cynically chose that very day to
>>advance an outrageous plan that will sell off leases for some
>>160,000 acres of spectacular Utah canyonlands to oil and gas
>>speculators.
>>
>>While America was voting for Barack Obama and his vision of a
>>clean energy future, Bush and Cheney’s underlings were
>>conspiring to plunder one of the crown jewels of our natural
>>heritage for their fossil fuel cronies.
>>
>>Please register your own opposition right now:
>>http://www.nrdconline.org/ct/m7xiMdd13PJm/
>>
>>The auction of Redrock country will take place on December 19.
>>At stake are world-renowned vistas near Canyonlands and Arches
>>National Parks, as well as near Dinosaur National Monument. The
>>highest bidders will earn the right to turn vast tracts of
>>pristine wilderness into industrial wastelands.
>>
>>It’s bad enough that Bush officials went behind the backs of the
>>American people with this disastrous scheme. But what’s worse,
>>they didn’t even tell their own National Park Service until
>>after the fact.
>>
>>In my mind, this theft of our heritage goes beyond the cynical
>>– it’s criminal. What will be left to give to our children and
>>their children if we allow this administration, in a parting
>>shot, to destroy our legacy of public lands for short-term gain?
>>
>>I hope you’re as angry as I am about this blatant land grab,
>>because we’ve got to stop it — and we have to act fast. The
>>NRDC Action Fund is mobilizing more than one million Americans
>>in an outpouring of protest over the coming days.
>>
>>Send your own message of opposition immediately:
>>http://www.nrdconline.org/ct/m7xiMdd13PJm/
>>
>>Tell the Bush Administration that you will not allow it to
>>destroy one of the most beautiful places on Earth.
>>
>>We’ll automatically send copies of your message to your two
>>senators, your representative and to the Obama transition team,
>>which has signaled their opposition to this disastrous attack on
>>our Redrock heritage.
>>
>>The Bush Administration is racing to complete the auction of our
>>lands before Inauguration Day, which will make sales difficult
>>to reverse.
>>
>>We must fend off this land grab now — before the oil and gas
>>companies can lay claim to the spoils.
>>
>>Those spoils include stretches of Desolation Canyon, which has
>>been proposed for national park status. Bush’s own Interior
>>Department describes the canyon as “a place where a visitor can
>>experience true solitude — where the forces of nature continue
>>to shape the colorful, rugged landscape.”
>>
>>The very idea of oil and gas operations invading these remote
>>sanctuaries — which have remained untouched for millennia — is
>>deeply upsetting. Once the dirty deed is done, our wilderness
>>can never be restored. That’s why I’m asking you to help us
>>sound the alarm and organize now.
>>
>>Tell the Bush Administration to cancel the Redrock auction:
>>http://www.nrdconline.org/ct/m7xiMdd13PJm/
>>
>>Remind them that we the people are the rightful owners of this
>>majestic wilderness and that we won’t stand for its destruction.
>>
>>And thank you for joining with me and the NRDC Action Fund to
>>save these beautiful wildlands for all future generations.
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>
>>Robert Redford
>>NRDC Action Fund
>>
>>P.S. After you send your own message of protest, I’ll let you
>>know of an easy way to spread the word to your friends and
>>family:
>>http://www.nrdconline.org/ct/m7xiMdd13PJm/ . With only 10 days
>>to mobilize one million Americans, I’m counting on you to rally
>>everyone you know to speak out and save this precious wilderness
>>from destruction.
>>
>>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>>If you would prefer not to receive action alerts and updates,
>>you can click here to remove yourself from this list:
>>http://www.nrdconline.org/actionfund/remove-domain-direct.tcl?ctx=subscription&nkey=8iwe6nx447tkj3ik&
>>(or you can reply to this email with the word “remove” in the
>>subject line.)
>>
>>To update your email or mailing address, or to view all your
>>subscriptions, click here:
>>http://www.nrdconline.org/actionfund/smp.tcl?nkey=8iwe6nx447tkj3ik&
>>
>>The NRDC Action Fund is the 501(c)(4) affiliate of the Natural
>>Resources Defense Council (NRDC).
>>
>>

Native Nations: Standing Together for Civil Rights

Dec 12th, 2008 Posted in NEWS & POLITICS | no comment »

Native Nations: Standing Together for Civil Rights

Presented by the National Council of Churches USA, produced by the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

Native Nations, hosted by Peter Coyote, chronicles the American Indians’ struggle for civil rights, and the creation of the National Indian Lutheran Board to raise funds and awareness for that struggle.  From the controversy surrounding the 1862 trial when 38 Dakota Sioux were executed in the largest single-day mass hanging in United States history, to the confrontation of the 1960s when many Indian tribes joined together to speak out with a unified voice, Native Nations tells the story of standing together for sovereignty, justice and civil rights.

ON KSTP TV CH 5 ABC MINNEAPOLIS MN 12/28/08 3:00 PM

This documentary film will be presented by Syd Beane at All Nations Indian Church on Sunday December 14th, 2008 at 11:30 a.m.

Visit www.elca.org/nativenations for a video preview.

William (Bill) Carter

American Indian Community Advocate

City of Minneapolis

Direct: (612) 673-3028

Fax: (612) 673-2599

Strength and answers (to you)


Shakopee concedes tribal expansion fight. . . for now

Dec 4th, 2008 Posted in NEWS & POLITICS | no comment »

Shakopee is backing down from a legal fight over the expansion of the nearby Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community.

By DAVID PETERSON, Star Tribune
Last update: December 3, 2008 – 3:55 PM

city of shakopee mn minnesota The city of Shakopee is backing away from its fight to stop the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux native american indian community reservationShakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community from widening the borders of its reservation by several hundred acres, a move it described a year ago as a threat to its future as a rapidly growing suburb.

But it says it has achieved a concession: The federal government has pledged, from now on, to bring the city in as an active player any time the casino-enriched tribe tries to make a similar move.

“And that will happen again,” Mayor John J. Schmitt shakopee mayor Mayor John Schmitt said. “We’re certain of it.”

The dispute is over the tribe’s desire to place more than 700 acres it has acquired, most of it in Shakopee, into what is known as trust status. That makes it, effectively, part of a sovereign nation, removing it from the tax rolls and from zoning control by surrounding jurisdictions.

shakopee mdewakanton sioux community tribal land buys purchases It was at best a somber city council that dropped its dukes-up posture on Tuesday night and approved a tentative deal with the U.S. bia b i a b.i.a. Bureau_of_Indian_Affairs afairs Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), avoiding an expensive full-scale legal challenge at a time when the city faces a budget crunch severe enough to force it to cut staff positions.

“We were forced to go this alone, financially, since our ‘good neighbors,’ Prior Lake and Scott County, decided to leave us

hanging in the lurch,” said Council Member Steve Clay. “They decided not to participate with us in this endeavor, and it’s expensive. My impression is, this is probably the best result we can expect, given the time and expense we are willing to put into it.”

Prior Lake has been forging a cooperative relationship with the tribe for some time now. The Scott County board only narrowly, on a 3-2 vote, made the same call a year ago.

Both county board members representing the tribe’s closest neighbors had wanted to fight on. And some interpreted the results of this fall’s elections for county board as an expression of continued public unhappiness. The two candidates who took the most skeptical positions on the tribe were elected, and a candidate with family connections to the tribe was defeated.

Tribal officials were preparing a formal written response on Wednesday but had no immediate comment.

The tentative, seven-page agreement has a number of key elements that will make any future dispute of this kind more fair when it comes to the impact upon the city, Schmitt said Wednesday.

“Basically, the BIA is now responsible for bringing [the tribe] to the table, giving us early notice, making us legally a party in anything that’s being done, and lets us talk about ‘cumulative effects’” on the city and not just its concerns over lost tax revenue, he said.

Specifically, he said:

• The BIA must alert the city within days of any future trust application — a big change from what the city suspects has happened before, namely a lengthy period of behind-the-scenes activity before anything was unveiled. “We get the earliest possible notice, to facilitate our planning efforts,” so that nearby officials do not for instance wind up building a school in a part of town that will never have many students.

• The BIA must ask the tribe to sit down with the city and talk things out. It doesn’t have to, “but if they fail to participate, it becomes a matter of record that they are not willing to negotiate.”

• The city gains the right to put on the table the messy particulars of a tribe’s expansion in a fast-growing urban area in which expensive infrastructure such as sewer lines can become useless if certain key parcels disappear from the mix.

“It’s not like a tribe out in some rural area buying farmland,” Schmitt said. “In a metro area, you run into problems. It gets cloudy.”

• The city gets a measure of reassurance that there is no intent to add more casinos onto any of the newly sovereign land.

City Administrator Mark McNeill told the council he sees the agreement, which must still be ratified by the BIA, as “a good starting point for future cooperative efforts” among the BIA, the tribe and the city. “All parties benefit,” he said.

Council member Terry Joos described the agreement as a “good start,” adding:

“As we’ve sat here and gone through these negotiations, for lack of a better term, this is what we’ve been asking for all along. We never said no to expansion or gaming but want to be a participant and have input into what’s affecting the city of Shakopee. This is giving us a start on some of those issues.”

http://www.newsfornatives.com/blog native american news source information natives politics satire www.newsfornatives.com where native american indians go for news nationwide computer repair worldwide laptop repair cheap computer repair http://www.cheapestpcrepair.com/wow fastest laptop repair screen replacement mother board repair http://www.cheapestlaptoprepair.com virgin vegan vegetarian in des moines, ia http://www.stopthecarnivore.com stop eating meat no animal products